Freaks (1932)
Directed by Tod Browning
Screenplay by Willis Goldbeck and Leon Gordon, based
on the story “Spurs” by Tod Robbins
Runtime: 1 hour, 4 minutes
Freaks
is not a film which is easy to discuss, and I was torn as to whether to write
about it for Classic Horror Month. Not
only is it debatable whether Freaks
qualifies as a horror film, but also to review the film would require me to
possibly criticize the performances of people who were actually deformed—people
who legitimately were “circus freaks”.
However, in the end I decided that it was a film too good to pass up on,
and it may be a starting place for a discussion on what constitutes horror and
normality in society.
The story of Freaks contains both a central plot and
a series of vignettes about a group of circus performers. The main character is a short person named
Hans (Harry Earles), who is in love with a “normal” circus acrobat named
Cleopatra (Olga Blacanova). Cleopatra
and most of the other “normals” laugh at Hans and his comrades, but when
Cleopatra learns from Hans’ girlfriend Frieda (Daisy Earles) that Hans is heir
to a large fortune, she marries Hans and plots to kill him to gain his
inheritance.
Because of the
way this film is structured, this conflict doesn’t come up until more than
halfway through the film. The first part
of Freaks is largely devoted to
showcasing the various circus acts, both “freaks” and “normals” (and I will henceforth drop the scare quotes). It’s
difficult to decipher the purpose of these early scenes. Is it that the film wishes to engage in
exploitation by putting as many freaks on screen as possible, or does it wish
to portray their plight and challenge the audience to view them with sympathy?
Well, this may
be a cop-out answer, but it’s likely a little of both. There are certainly sequences which only
serve the purpose of entertainment. The
one that sticks out most in my mind is where the Living Torso, Prince Randian,
lights a cigarette using only his mouth.
It’s not as if the man is given a particularly developed character in
the film; in fact, that bit is practically his whole shtick. To see him struggle to do something most of
us would find rudimentary may elicit some pangs of sympathy, but its purpose
seems exploitative, and the same applies to many other performers as well.
However, at its
heart, Freaks takes a sympathetic
view of those with deformities. The
staging of the proceedings clearly condemns the harassment that Josephine
Joseph (the Half-Woman Half-Man) receives, and Madame Tetrallini (Rose Dione)
scolds the man who tells the freaks under her supervision to get off of his property. In fact, the film’s portrayal of these people
has such a noticeable heart to it that the bits which come across as
exploitative could probably be written off as unfortunate implications. I’m still not sure they should be, but they
could.
I must commend
the film for how it portrays certain characters not just as objects of
sympathy, but as actual people. Hans and
Frieda, other than being short, have a thoroughly human relationship, even if
their acting is a bit stiff and their accents miles thick. They lust, they get jealous and despondent,
the whole nine yards. In fact, while one
can’t ever forget that there’s a love quadrilateral involving two midgets, the whole
affair could easily be written for four random people plucked off of the
street.
Further, not all
of the “normals” are presented as malicious bastards out to steal
inheritances. Venus (Lelia Hyams) and
Phroso (Wallace Ford), who form a couple during the film—and get top
billing—are continually nice to the freaks, if a little condescending. They tangentially are involved in the freaks’
plot to get revenge on Cleopatra, and they joke around with their fellow
performers and practice new skits with them.
And given how the Earleses are not exactly the Barrymores, they are the
most compelling characters throughout.
As for the
horror element, well, it’s not really there.
At least not in the terror sense, it isn’t. The wedding sequence, which is the iconic bit
in the film, does get more than a little unnerving to watch, but at least to my
eyes, it’s more bizarre than scary.
Later on, when the freaks put their revenge plot into action and attack
Cleopatra and her beau, Hercules (Henry Victor), the cinematography is too
hectic to easily decipher what’s going on—confusing, yes, but not particularly
horrifying.
Once more,
however, that’s not a bad thing. In
fact, given the nature of the film’s subject, it’s probably for the best that Freaks doesn’t turn into a straight
horror film. Instead, it’s a weird
little funhouse ride through a 1930s circus with a bit of social commentary
thrown in for good measure. It’s still
more than a little uncomfortable to watch at times, but Freaks ultimately has its heart in the right place. This might not be a Halloween film for the whole
family, but it is worth a watch someday.
No comments:
Post a Comment