Montenegro (1981)
Directed by Dušan Makavejev
Screenplay by Dušan Makavejev,
Donald Arthur and Branko Vucicevic
Runtime: 1 hr, 31 min
I’m
going to level with you here: I was kind of frightened to watch this film. I’ve not watched any of Yugoslav director
Dušan Makavejev’s other films, but as a fan of the Internet video series Brows Held High, I did have a passing
familiarity with his work. From watching
the episodes on W. R.: Mysteries of the
Organism and Sweet Movie (both
NSFW), I gleaned that Makavejev’s oeuvre was both nonsensical and
sickening. Yet, I had also heard good
things about one of his more conventional films, so I took a deep breath,
pressed play…and had a wonderful time.
Montenegro, despite the title, is actually set in Sweden,
while the main character is an American.
Marilyn Jordan (Susan Anspach) is a frustrated and bored housewife,
married to Swedish businessman Martin (Erland Josephson). Marilyn feels trapped in her domestic life,
but does not have proper way to vent her frustrations. At first she engages in behavior that ranges
from strange to borderline psychotic, which eventually raises Martin’s
suspicions. He has a psychiatrist (Per
Oscarsson) analyze her, but it is to no avail.
I
have not yet begun to describe this plot.
This is one element of Montenegro
that delights me; the plot relies on so many ridiculous contingencies to move
forward. So: the Jordan family
accidentally calls to two taxis to take Martin to the airport. Marilyn decides to take the second in order
to travel with Martin, but she gets detained by security over gardening
shears. She just so happens to meet a
woman emigrating from Yugoslavia; with nowhere to go and not knowing Martin
missed the flight waiting for her, she joins her party and ends up at
“Zanzi-Bar”, a combination commune and strip-club.
A
rational story, I’m sure you will all agree.
Yet insanity, both clinical and situational, lies at the heart of Montenegro. Sometimes, it’s played for laughs, as is the
case with the scenes at Zanzi-Bar, including a remote controlled tank with a
phallus for a gun turret (I never thought I would have to write that). But during the film’s first half, the madness
draws sympathy. The audience can tell
that Marilyn is not happy with her husband and home life, but it is difficult
to determine whether her attempts to poison the dog and set the bed on fire are
acts of rebellion or of a woman losing her grip on reason.
Whatever
state her character actually is in, I must argue for a round of applause for
Anspach; her performance is phenomenal.
She embodies so many emotions all at once: delirium, anger, despair,
curiosity. Given both the loveless
environment he lives in and the ridiculous world of Zanzi-Bar she moves into,
such confused feelings are expected and delivered expertly. Though her early scenes come close to being
silly (the way she eats all the family’s Wiener schnitzel sticks out), Anspach
is consistently a fascinating screen presence.
The other players are wonderful, too, but all pale in comparison.
Aside
from the group of Yugoslav immigrants, why is this movie is called Montenegro? It turns out that a man who calls himself
Montenegro (Svetozar Cvetkovic) becomes Marilyn’s love interest over the course
of the film. Cvetkovic is one of the
weaker actors in the film, and the chemistry between Montenegro and Marilyn is
very shallow, but that’s kind of the point.
Montenegro is Marilyn’s sexual liberator; he is largely an object of
lust that gives her an avenue to express her own frustrations, but it is
abundantly clear that any future between the two would not end well.
Given
the lustiness of their scenes together, it’s surprising that the consummation
of Marilyn and Montenegro’s attraction is not the most explicit part of the
film. Then again, at least compared to
what I’ve seen of W. R. and Sweet Movie, I was shocked by how
restrained Montenegro is. There is no nudity whatsoever until the start
of the third act, and even then it only pops up sporadically. A sequence involving the phallic tank and a
stripper at Zanzi-Bar does carry a lot of connotations of sexual assault, but
it’s clearly part of an act and the rest of the film is rather tame.
Makavejev
does make some choices in the picture that don’t quite work. For one, the use of Marianne Faithfull’s
version of “The Ballad of Lucy Jordan”—written by Shel Silverstein of all
people—is, while, thematically appropriate, far too on the nose play over the
opening credits. Also, there’s this odd
international motif in the film which Makavejev plays up: an American woman,
living in Sweden, meets a group of immigrants from Yugoslavia who live in
Zanzi-Bar and for some reason flew there on a Japan Airlines flight. Maybe Makavejev had a grand statement in
mind, but the juxtapositions are just off.
Those,
obviously, are nitpicks. Montenegro is such an enrapturing film
that I kind of feel guilty for being so skeptical of it. Makavejev knows how to get the pathos out of
film and while he has an affinity for the weird, the bizarre, and the use of
gratuitous nudity, his finished product is never boring but always
enticing. This doesn’t mean that I’m in
any rush to watch Sweet Movie; filmed
defecation is several lines too far. But
I definitely come out this experience respecting him as a storyteller.
No comments:
Post a Comment